To talk about the resurrection we can start with
our very own selves. Our hopes can help us appreciate the resurrection.
Who are we? We are humans and we are flesh. We are embodied persons.
We are not air. We are not gas. We are not angels. We are not pure spirits. We
are persons of flesh and blood. Our experience of our body is quite ambivalent.
On one hand we experience our body as something we have, like a tool or a
shirt. We feel a distance from our body. Yet at the same time we also experience an identity with our body: “I
am my body”. If someone holds my hand that person is holding my hand. That person is holding a piece
of myself. But at the same time that
person is also holding me.
So there is this experience of
distance and identity with our body. When a person dies the body turns into a
cadaver. It continues to be a human body but it has stopped all web of
relationships with others and the world. It is dead. We have memories of the
dead…but the dead is dead and the body is a cadaver.
Still, we make the effort to bury
the dead. We do ceremonies and rituals. There is a sense of importance we give
even to that dead person—even to that cadaver. But there is probably something
more in what we do when we respectfully treat the dead.
We treat with respect the dead. Let
us look at the dynamism inside of us when we do this. We just do not want to
keep memories of the dead. We assert that somehow….somewhere along the way…we
can hope that death is not the end of that person.
A French philosopher, Gabriel
Marcel, once wrote, “If I love you then you will not die”. In other words my
love for you hopes that death is not the end. My love for you does not end, so
I continue to expect that my love will continue even after death. Love aims at
the eternal.
So many cultures hold on to this
respect for the dead, this love and this hope. It is a hope we find little
words to explain. It is deep within us.
Let us call this a “transcendental
hope”. It is the hope that really life can be fuller and so eternal. It is the
hope that the “bad things” that happen to us in life will never win…and that
death will never win completely. It is this hope that can make us appreciate
the resurrection of Christ.
The resurrection of Jesus is not
historical…and it is historical. It is not historical because history (as
science) cannot verify that someone who died lived again after. History does
not have the competence to say that there is life after death. History is
limited to its study of place and time. Life after death is already outside
place and time. So we cannot have a claim on the historicity of the
resurrection.
Yet the resurrection is historical.
It happened to a specific man, Jesus, in a place and time. How do we know that?
There are historical traces. What are
they? There are the attestations of the Apostles. They said that they saw the
risen Lord. They said that they saw him alive again. This affirmation cannot be
denied historically. It is historically
true that Apostles said that. We can also add that there were many people,
especially the early Christians, who have accepted that witnessing of the
Apostles. The impact of the experience extended far and wide beyond the circle
of the Apostles.
Although we cannot scientifically
verify that Jesus indeed had risen from the dead, we can in faith accept it. We can in
faith accept the witnessing of the Apostles.
For the Apostles the resurrection
was God’s way of raising his son from the dead. It was the eschatological act
of God done within history. Jesus was the same man in history, the same man who
lived in Palestine in the first century. The risen Lord is the same man of
Nazareth. There is a continuity. Yet there is a discontinuity because the risen
Lord is not glorified. Yes, he is the same man, the same body, but in a
radically new condition.
This can explain why, at first, the
Apostles could not immediately identify the risen Jesus. They needed faith to
recognize the risen Lord.
There is one theme that is so often
mentioned when discussing the resurrection. This is “the empty tomb”. The fact
that the tomb was empty does not prove
the resurrection. Who knows, maybe someone stole the body.
Yet the empty tomb can generate
faith. It can be sign of the
resurrection. It can signify that Jesus was not abandoned to the corruption of
the body. The empty tomb announces the accomplishment of the eschatology when
corruption ceases to win. It is not the definite destiny of the human being.
Finally, there is also the point
about Jesus sitting at the right hand of God. That Jesus sitting there is a
human Jesus too in full human embodiment. This tells us that “one of us”—a human—is
in full communion with the divine. The Apostles saw that thanks to Jesus, as
fully human, was elevated to the throne of God, we too can have a share in that
communion. That communion is made possible thanks to the risen Lord.