1. The Church does not offer specific
political-economic systems. This, however, does not stop the Church from forming the conscience of the faithful. The
Church must still form and encourage the faithful, especially the laity.
Christian faith is not abstract and outside social realities. The presence of
the Church inside society is required by faith. Gaudium et spes # 75 states that it is an error to separate faith from social concerns today.
2. The Church, in her faith, can make moral
statements about social life. Whenever the Church sees violations of human
dignity, the common good, etc., she can raise her voice. All social dimensions
touching on ethics and morality fall in the competence of the Church.
3. But, as we said it before, direct partisan
political involvement is not in the competence of the whole Church. The
competence lies in the hands of the laity. What the Church desires is that the
faithful have conscience of their rights
and duties in the light of the Gospel.Therefore the faithful work together
inb the service of society.
4. Priests and religious have work to “evangelize”
temporal realities. They maintain a distance from partisan involvement. They
are not engaged in specific parties and groups that will compromise the unity of the community.
5. We have said that the domain of the laity
is the temporal situation of society. The
laity has hand-on engagement with politics and economics. Priests and religious
are given the role of formation of
conscience. The laity then feels supported by both the hierarchy and by
people of consecrated life. The lay people, in
their technical, political and scientific works are guided. Of course this
will mean that the “formators” have a good understanding of the social doctrine
and of moral theology of the Church.
6. Still the laity also has the duty to seek
for formation. The work to “evangelize” society is not given to the laity by
the priests and religious. That duty is inherent
in the laity. As baptized members of the Church the laity plays a critical
role inside the temporal affairs of society. Maybe today we see more and more
lay people getting involved. Lumen gentium # 33 says that in many situations
the Church can never be “light of the world” (Lumen gentium) without the laity.
Formation of “formators” and
laity
7. The “formators” (priests and religious)
are very important. The laity depend on the competence
of the “formators”. A sufficient intuition of the social doctrine is necessary
for “formators”. (This is perhaps why MAPAC is offering this course). Surely it
will be helpful if “formators” read the documents of the social doctrine.
Spiritual formation is also very helpful. Studying the social doctrine and
developing a strong prayer life go together.
8. The social doctrine of the Church touches
on social realities. Thus there is also the need to have some amount of
knowledge about society. A study of the social sciences can really help.
Together with the knowledge of principles—like common good and subsidiarity—reflection
on concrete realities in society is necessary too. It will be helpful if the “formator”
can also comment on actual social issues. (This can explain why, in MAPAC,
there is a course in social science.)
9. Our societies experience a lot of changes.
Social evolution can, at times, be fast. The “formator” should not be deprived
of knowledge and onformation about the changes going on in society.
10. Priests and religious have direct contact
with people. They have direct contact with what is going on in society. The
experiences can differ—in place, culture, etc. The concrete experiences of “formators”
can really be a big help.
11. Lay people may be so involved with the
temporal concerns; it is helpful if they get information about the social
doctrine of the Church. Is it possible to stimulate the interests of the laity
on this subject? Is it possible to stimulate them into seeing the social engagement of the whole Church?
Is it possible to stimulate their interests in documents of the Church, and
documents on the social doctrine in particular?
12. Of course local Churches too have their
documents. It is not enough to have an idea of what the universal Church says.
It is also important to stimulate interest in what local Churches say.
13. Note then the formation towards a
sensitivity about what the Church says regarding society. This is helpful for
the laity who may need to be guided about how they will involve themselves
directly in politics, economics and other social aspects.
14. Of course the central duty of the laity is
to bear witness to Christ and his gospel in the midst of social life. Priests
and religious can talk about Christ but can that penetrate actual society
through the work of the laity? Everyone—priests, religious and laity—contribute
in each one’s way in society through the
proclamation of (and dialogue with) the gospel of Christ. How can the
Gospel find its way into social realities? Everyone, united with Christ, has a
role in society.
15. The laity needs to see their mission and responsibility in the domain of social affairs. Can they have awareness of this? Priests and religious can accompany the laity in their mission: support them with constant moral and spiritual formation. Priests and religious can accompany the laity in the daily struggles of social life.
15. The laity needs to see their mission and responsibility in the domain of social affairs. Can they have awareness of this? Priests and religious can accompany the laity in their mission: support them with constant moral and spiritual formation. Priests and religious can accompany the laity in the daily struggles of social life.
No comments:
Post a Comment